Rammeverk, teorier, modeller
Ebnehoseini, Z., Tabesh, H., Jangi, M. J., Deldar, K., Mostafavi, S. M. & Tara, M. (2021). Investigating Evaluation Frameworks for Electronic Health Record: A Literature Review. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(E), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.3421
Cresswell, K., Williams, R. & Sheikh, A. (2020). Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e15068. https://doi.org/10.2196/15068
Se også, fra pensumboka; Health Informatics Research Methods Principles and Practice
Kapittel: Research Frame and Designs. Elizabeth J. Forrestal, In: Health informatics research methods. Table 1.1. Selected theories and models used in health informatics and HIM research Link (du må være tilkoblet eduVPN for tilgang)
A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories by Call Number: elektronisk tilgang artikkelTaherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137- Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(5), e18500. https://doi.org/10.2196/18500 by Call Number: elektronisk tilgjengligPublication Date: 2021
Improving Usability, Safety and Patient Outcomes with Health Information Technology by
Information technology is revolutionizing healthcare, and the uptake of health information technologies is rising, but scientific research and industrial and governmental support will be needed if these technologies are to be implemented effectively to build capacity at regional, national and global levels. This book, "Improving Usability, Safety and Patient Outcomes with Health Information Technology", presents papers from the Information Technology and Communications in Health conference, ITCH 2019, held in Victoria, Canada from 14 to 17 February 2019. The conference takes a multi-perspective view of what is needed to move technology forward to sustained and widespread use by transitioning research findings and approaches into practice. Topics range from improvements in usability and training and the need for new and improved designs for information systems, user interfaces and interoperable solutions, to governmental policy, mandates, initiatives and the need for regulation. The knowledge and insights gained from the ITCH 2019 conference will surely stimulate fruitful discussions and collaboration to bridge research and practice and improve usability, safety and patient outcomes, and the book will be of interest to all those associated with the development, implementation and delivery of health IT solutions.
Call Number: elektronisk tilgangISBN: 9781614999508Publication Date: 2019
Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories by Call Number: elektronisk tilgangISBN: 9783030649876Publication Date: 2021- Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. by Call Number: via JSTOR:Publication Date: 1992. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
- The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. by Call Number: via JSTOR:Publication Date: 2003. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
- A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. by Call Number: elektronisk tilgangPublication Date: Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(Suppl 3), i68.
Søkeord ... for noen søke-elementer, flere kan finnes
Teori, modeller: theor* OR model* OR framework*
Eller spesifikke:
D&M IS Success Model
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
Theory of Interpersonal Behavior (TIB)
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Extension of TAM (ETAM)
Igbaria’s Model (IM)
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)
Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DOI)
Perceived Characteristics of Innovating Theory (PCIT)
Motivational Model (MM)
Uses and Gratification Theory (U&G)
The Model of PC Utilization (MPCU)
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
Compatibility UTAUT (C-UTAUT)
Socio-technical systems theory/model
HOT-fit : "human, organization and technology-fit factor*"
Brukeradopsjon, brukeratferd, brukerendring:
adoption OR acceptance
"perceived usefulnes*" OR "ease of use"
MeSH: Medical Subject headings
"Diffusion of Innovation"
(Scope note: The broad dissemination of
new ideas, procedures, techniques, materials, and devices and the degree to which these are accepted and used)
"Implementation Science"
"Technology Transfer"
"Information Systems"
"Models, Theoretical"
"Systems Analysis"
"User-Computer Interface"
Databaser for søk, med eksempler:
Scopus:
Her brukt avansert søk. Feltkoder står før søkeordene. TITLE = ordene må forekomme i artikkelens tittel:
TITLE(accept* OR adopt*) AND TITLE(technolog* OR digital* OR ehealth* OR mhealth* OR application* OR apps OR "mobile health*" OR telemedicin* OR "electronic health*" OR telehealth* OR "tele-medicin*" OR "tele-health*") AND TITLE(theor* OR model* OR framework*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH(health* OR hospital* OR "nursing home*")
Google Scholar
eksempel på søk, der | = OR
technology|digital| theory|theories|model|models|framework acceptance|adopt|adoption link
"socio-technical system|systems" link til treff
Eksempler på treff:
Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
ORIA
- ord i tittel: "information system" OR "information systems" OR teknologi OR informasjonssystemer OR technology OR digital OR digitale OR informatic OR informatics
- AND acceptance OR adopt OR adoption OR brukeratferd
- AND theory OR theories OR teori OR teorier OR model OR modeller OR models OR rammeverk OR framework
- Limit: Bøker, siste 20år
Brukeradopsjon, brukeratferd, brukerendring:
adoption OR acceptance
"perceived usefulnes*" OR "ease of use"
(modell for å vurdere suksess i IS)
Se fanen bøker og artikler:
DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (1992)
DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003)
Handbook of Usability Testing by
Whether it's software, a cell phone, or a refrigerator, your customer wants - no, expects - your product to be easy to use. This fully revised handbook provides clear, step-by-step guidelines to help you test your product for usability. Completely updated with current industry best practices, it can give you that all-important marketplace advantage: products that perform the way users expect. You'll learn to recognize factors that limit usability, decide where testing should occur, set up a test plan to assess goals for your product's usability, and more.
Call Number: søk i ORIAISBN: 9780470185483Publication Date: 2008-05-12
Eksempeler på artikler fra søk i Scopus:
TITLE( "e-health" OR ehealth OR mhealth OR "mhealth" OR "electronic health" OR "mobile health*" OR "digital health*" OR "digital technology" OR "health technol*") AND TITLE(usabil*) link
Jaspers, M. W. M. (2009). A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(5), 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002
Brown, W., Yen, P. Y., Rojas, M. & Schnall, R. (2013). Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(6), 1080-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.001
Hyzy, M., Bond, R., Mulvenna, M., Bai, L., Dix, A., Leigh, S. & Hunt, S. (2022). System Usability Scale Benchmarking for Digital Health Apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 10(8), Artikkel e37290. https://doi.org/10.2196/37290
Jake-Schoffman, D. E., Silfee, V. J., Waring, M. E., Boudreaux, E. D., Sadasivam, R. S., Mullen, S. P., Carey, J. L., Hayes, R. B., Ding, E. Y.,
Bennett, G. G. & Pagoto, S. L. (2017). Methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(12), Artikkel e190. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8758
Liew, M. S., Zhang, J., See, J. & Ong, Y. L. (2019). Usability challenges for health and wellness mobile apps: Mixed-methods study among mHealth experts and consumers. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(1), Artikkel e12160. https://doi.org/10.2196/12160
Maramba, I., Chatterjee, A. & Newman, C. (2019). Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126, 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018
Roman, L. C., Ancker, J. S., Johnson, S. B. & Senathirajah, Y. (2017). Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 67, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.005
Schnall, R., Cho, H. & Liu, J. (2018). Health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES) for usability assessment of mobile health technology: Validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(1), Artikkel e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8851
Zapata, B. C., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Idri, A. & Toval, A. (2015). Empirical Studies on Usability of mHealth Apps: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(2), 1-19, Artikkel 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2
Sociotechnical / socio-technical
"sociotechnical model"
"socio-technical model"
"Work System Framework"
"work system method"
"Work System Theory"
"Integrated technology-organization-environment"
Eksempel på søkeord
("e-health" OR ehealth OR mhealth OR "mhealth" OR "electronic health" OR "mobile health*" OR "digital health*" OR "digital technology") AND (literacy OR competenc* OR knowledge OR skill*)
Link til treff søk i Scopus, artikkelens tittel
Artikkel eksempler
- Dale, J. G., Lüthi, A., Fundingsland Skaraas, B., Rundereim, T. & Dale, B. (2020). Testing Measurement Properties of the Norwegian Version of Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) in a Group of Day Surgery Patients. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 13, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S242985
- Norgaard, O., Furstrand, D., Klokker, L., Karnoe, A., Batterham, R., Kayser, L. & Osborne, R. H. (2015). The e-health literacy framework: A conceptual framework for characterizing e-health users and their interaction with e-health systems. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 7(4), 522-540. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2015.07.035
- Norman, C. D. & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(4), e27-e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27
- Norman, C. D. & Skinner, H. A. (2006). eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2), e9-e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9
- Terp, R., Kayser, L. & Lindhardt, T. (2021). Older Patients' Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study. JMIR human factors, 8(2), e27005-e27005. https://doi.org/10.2196/27005
"human, organization and technology-fit factor*"
"Human, Organization, and Technology–Fit"
"HOT-fit"
Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A. & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386-398.
