Skip to main content

Systematiske litteraturstudier/Systematic literature reviews (HELIDR)

Bibliotekets fagside (Helse- og idrettsvitenskap)

Litteraturstudier /Review types

Different Review types

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information And Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

  • Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L. & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276
  • Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

..."what exactly is a systematic review? How does it differ from other types of reviews? And how do you systematically search the literature?" Karolinska Institutet, University library

Databaser med hovedvekt på systematiske oversikter - Databases for systematic reviews

En forskningsoppsummering vil si å sammenfatte de relevante forskningsresultatene som foreligger på et gitt tidspunkt. "Systematisk oppsummering av forskning kjennetegnes ved en systematisk ogeksplisitt framgangsmåte i å formulere spørsmål, søke etter litteratur, vurdere,sammenstille og presentere den forskningsbaserte kunnskapen"  Slik oppsummer vi forskning

Databaser/nettsteder med vekt på systematiske oversikter:

Merk

De flerste systematiske litteraturoversiktene blir publisert som artikler tidsskrifter - og søkbare via databaser som MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus etc - som vil ha en hovedvekt på orginalstudier (enkeltstudier). Avgrens søket ditt til oversikter. 

Scoping studies

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Baldini Soares, C., Khalil, H. & Parker, D. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. I A. E. & M. Z. (Red.), Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ 

PRISMA SCR-Scoping Reviews Statement and Checklist http://www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/ScopingReviews  

  • Arksey, H. & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J. & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxf), 33(1), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
  • Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., … Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291-1294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
  • Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B. & Parker, D. (2016). An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  • Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D. & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050
  • Pham, M. T., Rajic, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A. & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods, 5(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
  • Townsend, W. A., Anderson, P. F., Ginier, E. C., MacEachern, M. P., Saylor, K. M., Shipman, B. L. & Smith, J. E. (2017). A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc, 105(3), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.189

Bøker i biblioteket - Books in the library

Meta-analysis - books in the library

Metasynthesis - Books in the library